Review PolicySubmission Guidelines:
While submitting the research article, authors should ensure that the research work is novel and has not previously been published, as well as that it is not currently being considered for publication in any other conferences/journals.Review Policy:
Conferences will frequently plan to publish research works that provide preliminary research findings rather than a more complete research work that could be considered for publishing in a conference proceedings.
The conference articles will be subjected to the regular double-blind peer-review process with the experienced and qualified reviewers.
Conference papers should make a significant research contribution by either suggesting a new approach or conducting a thorough study and unique comparison of existing research material.
Each article was reviewed by three to four reviewers, and the article was recommended based on the acceptance of two of them.Plagiarism:
A representation of existing/published author's language, including the use of their research flow/process, data, results/phrasing without citation of the source research article, will be considered an objectionable and inadmissible breach of their professional conduct at the conference. Plagiarism can have serious legal and ethical ramifications for the proposed author.
The overall similarity should be less than 20% and single source less than 5% only considered for the review process.